Related%20passage for Eruvin 205:14

ואידך הרכיבו דלא כרבי נתן דאמר החי נושא את עצמו הבאתו מחוץ לתחום כר"ע דאמר תחומין דאורייתא

If slaughtering which<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of all ordinary beast.');">⁴³</span> is forbidden under the category of work<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. work forbidden on the Sabbath under pentateuchal law.');">⁴⁴</span> supersedes the Sabbath, how much more so should these,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The acts enumerated in the anonymous Mishnah, of Pes.');">⁴⁵</span> which come only under the category of shebuth, supersede the Sabbath?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which shows that the prohibitions in the anonymous ruling, including that against the removal of the wen, are merely Rabbinical. How then could anyone maintain that the removal of a wen is a Pentateuchal prohibition?');">⁴⁶</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 205:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.